OK, last one before the World This Weekend...
Our old friend Jack Straw was in uber-obfuscation mode last Monday on the Today programme (BBC Radio 4, 08.11 hrs, April 25th).
Apologies for this having taken so long to get online, but it's been quite a busy week, as you've probably noticed.
I've broken the interview audio file into four MP3 files (most players will happily deal with these - if you're having trouble, leave a message, and I'll see if I can reformat them), so that you don't have one large download in order to listen.
The first 3 are about 4.6MB in size, the last chunk is just 584K.
First Bit
Second Bit
Third Bit
Last Bit
Now, there are a couple of challenges for you, dear listener, which take the form of a Pop Quiz:
1. How many times does he say 'with great respect' ?
2. How many times does he try to take John Humphrys off topic?
3. Do you think that the answer he gives about David Kelly and Bliar's two incongruous answers is anything short of disgraceful?
Oh, and I've included a little remixed musical version - just for my own entertainment, you understand.
Sunday, May 01, 2005
Religious Zealot
Friday, April 29, 2005
Ricin Crispies - direct from The Guardian's Ministry of Truth department
Since the Guardian has chosen to delete the following story from it's website, I thought it might be useful to re-post it here.
The actual question is, of course, why did they delete it in the first place?
I'm sure it wasn't government pressure. No, definately not. No way.
Anyhow - doesn't matter, cos here it is:
________________________________________________________________
Fake Terror - Ricin Ring That Never Was
Yesterday's trial collapse has exposed the deception behind attempts to link al-Qaida to a 'poison attack' on London By Duncan Campbell The Guardian - UK 4-15-5
Colin Powell does not need more humiliation over the manifold errors in his February 2003 presentation to the UN. But yesterday a London jury brought down another section of the case he made for war - that Iraq and Osama bin Laden were supporting and directing terrorist poison cells throughout Europe, including a London ricin ring.
Yesterday's verdicts on five defendants and the dropping of charges against four others make clear there was no ricin ring. Nor did the "ricin ring" make or have ricin. Not that the government shared that news with us. Until today, the public record for the past three fear-inducing years has been that ricin was found in the Wood Green flat occupied by some of yesterday's acquitted defendants. It wasn't.
The third plank of the al-Qaida-Iraq poison theory was the link between what Powell labelled the "UK poison cell" and training camps in Afghanistan. The evidence the government wanted to use to connect the defendants to Afghanistan and al-Qaida was never put to the jury. That was because last autumn a trial within a trial was secretly taking place. This was a private contest between a group of scientists from the Porton Down military research centre and myself. The issue was: where had the information on poisons and chemicals come from?
The information - five pages in Arabic, containing amateur instructions for making ricin, cyanide and botulinum, and a list of chemicals used in explosives - was at the heart of the case. The notes had been made by Kamel Bourgass, the sole convicted defendant. His co-defendants believed that he had copied the information from the internet. The prosecution claimed it had come from Afghanistan.
I was asked to look for the original source on the internet. This meant exploring Islamist websites that publish Bin Laden and his sympathisers, and plumbing the most prolific source of information on how to do harm: the writings of the American survivalist right and the gun lobby.
The experience of being an expert witness on these issues has made me feel a great deal safer on the streets of London. These were the internal documents of the supposed al-Qaida cell planning the "big one" in Britain. But the recipes were untested and unoriginal, borrowed from US sources. Moreover, ricin is not a weapon of mass destruction. It is a poison which has only ever been used for one-on-one killings and attempted killings.
If this was the measure of the destructive wrath that Bin Laden's followers were about to wreak on London, it was impotent. Yet it was the discovery of a copy of Bourgass's notes in Thetford in 2002 that inspired the wave of horror stories and government announcements and preparations for poison gas attacks.
It is true that when the team from Porton Down entered the Wood Green flat in January 2003, their field equipment registered the presence of ricin. But these were high sensitivity field detectors, for use where a false negative result could be fatal. A few days later in the lab, Dr Martin Pearce, head of the Biological Weapons Identification Group, found that there was no ricin. But when this result was passed to London, the message reportedly said the opposite.
The planned government case on links to Afghanistan was based only on papers that a freelance journalist working for the Times had scooped up after the US invasion of Kabul. Some were in Arabic, some in Russian. They were far more detailed than Bourgass's notes. Nevertheless, claimed Porton Down chemistry chief Dr Chris Timperley, they showed a "common origin and progression" in the methods, thus linking the London group of north Africans to Afghanistan and Bin Laden.
The weakness of Timperley's case was that neither he nor the intelligence services had examined any other documents that could have been the source. We were told Porton Down and its intelligence advisers had never previously heard of the "Mujahideen Poisons Handbook, containing recipes for ricin and much more". The document, written by veterans of the 1980s Afghan war, has been on the net since 1998.
All the information roads led west, not to Kabul but to California and the US midwest. The recipes for ricin now seen on the internet were invented 20 years ago by survivalist Kurt Saxon. He advertises videos and books on the internet. Before the ricin ring trial started, I phoned him in Arizona. For $110, he sent me a fistful of CDs and videos on how to make bombs, missiles, booby traps - and ricin. We handed a copy of the ricin video to the police.
When, in October, I showed that the chemical lists found in London were an exact copy of pages on an internet site in Palo Alto, California, the prosecution gave up on the Kabul and al-Qaida link claims. But it seems this information was not shared with the then home secretary, David Blunkett, who was still whipping up fear two weeks later. "Al-Qaida and the international network is seen to be, and will be demonstrated through the courts over months to come, actually on our doorstep and threatening our lives," he said on November 14.
The most ironic twist was an attempt to introduce an "al-Qaida manual" into the case. The manual - called the Manual of the Afghan Jihad - had been found on a raid in Manchester in 2000. It was given to the FBI to produce in the 2001 New York trial for the first attack on the World Trade Centre. But it wasn't an al-Qaida manual. The name was invented by the US department of justice in 2001, and the contents were rushed on to the net to aid a presentation to the Senate by the then attorney general, John Ashcroft, supporting the US Patriot Act.
To show that the Jihad manual was written in the 1980s and the period of the US-supported war against the Soviet occupation was easy. The ricin recipe it contained was a direct translation from a 1988 US book called the Poisoner's Handbook, by Maxwell Hutchkinson.
We have all been victims of this mass deception. I do not doubt that Bourgass would have contemplated causing harm if he was competent to do so. But he was an Islamist yobbo on his own, not an Al Qaida-trained superterrorist. An Asbo might be appropriate.
________________________________________________________
Duncan Campbell is an investigative writer and a scientific expert witness on computers and telecommunications. He is author of War Plan UK and is not the Guardian journalist of the same name
The actual question is, of course, why did they delete it in the first place?
I'm sure it wasn't government pressure. No, definately not. No way.
Anyhow - doesn't matter, cos here it is:
________________________________________________________________
Fake Terror - Ricin Ring That Never Was
Yesterday's trial collapse has exposed the deception behind attempts to link al-Qaida to a 'poison attack' on London By Duncan Campbell The Guardian - UK 4-15-5
Colin Powell does not need more humiliation over the manifold errors in his February 2003 presentation to the UN. But yesterday a London jury brought down another section of the case he made for war - that Iraq and Osama bin Laden were supporting and directing terrorist poison cells throughout Europe, including a London ricin ring.
Yesterday's verdicts on five defendants and the dropping of charges against four others make clear there was no ricin ring. Nor did the "ricin ring" make or have ricin. Not that the government shared that news with us. Until today, the public record for the past three fear-inducing years has been that ricin was found in the Wood Green flat occupied by some of yesterday's acquitted defendants. It wasn't.
The third plank of the al-Qaida-Iraq poison theory was the link between what Powell labelled the "UK poison cell" and training camps in Afghanistan. The evidence the government wanted to use to connect the defendants to Afghanistan and al-Qaida was never put to the jury. That was because last autumn a trial within a trial was secretly taking place. This was a private contest between a group of scientists from the Porton Down military research centre and myself. The issue was: where had the information on poisons and chemicals come from?
The information - five pages in Arabic, containing amateur instructions for making ricin, cyanide and botulinum, and a list of chemicals used in explosives - was at the heart of the case. The notes had been made by Kamel Bourgass, the sole convicted defendant. His co-defendants believed that he had copied the information from the internet. The prosecution claimed it had come from Afghanistan.
I was asked to look for the original source on the internet. This meant exploring Islamist websites that publish Bin Laden and his sympathisers, and plumbing the most prolific source of information on how to do harm: the writings of the American survivalist right and the gun lobby.
The experience of being an expert witness on these issues has made me feel a great deal safer on the streets of London. These were the internal documents of the supposed al-Qaida cell planning the "big one" in Britain. But the recipes were untested and unoriginal, borrowed from US sources. Moreover, ricin is not a weapon of mass destruction. It is a poison which has only ever been used for one-on-one killings and attempted killings.
If this was the measure of the destructive wrath that Bin Laden's followers were about to wreak on London, it was impotent. Yet it was the discovery of a copy of Bourgass's notes in Thetford in 2002 that inspired the wave of horror stories and government announcements and preparations for poison gas attacks.
It is true that when the team from Porton Down entered the Wood Green flat in January 2003, their field equipment registered the presence of ricin. But these were high sensitivity field detectors, for use where a false negative result could be fatal. A few days later in the lab, Dr Martin Pearce, head of the Biological Weapons Identification Group, found that there was no ricin. But when this result was passed to London, the message reportedly said the opposite.
The planned government case on links to Afghanistan was based only on papers that a freelance journalist working for the Times had scooped up after the US invasion of Kabul. Some were in Arabic, some in Russian. They were far more detailed than Bourgass's notes. Nevertheless, claimed Porton Down chemistry chief Dr Chris Timperley, they showed a "common origin and progression" in the methods, thus linking the London group of north Africans to Afghanistan and Bin Laden.
The weakness of Timperley's case was that neither he nor the intelligence services had examined any other documents that could have been the source. We were told Porton Down and its intelligence advisers had never previously heard of the "Mujahideen Poisons Handbook, containing recipes for ricin and much more". The document, written by veterans of the 1980s Afghan war, has been on the net since 1998.
All the information roads led west, not to Kabul but to California and the US midwest. The recipes for ricin now seen on the internet were invented 20 years ago by survivalist Kurt Saxon. He advertises videos and books on the internet. Before the ricin ring trial started, I phoned him in Arizona. For $110, he sent me a fistful of CDs and videos on how to make bombs, missiles, booby traps - and ricin. We handed a copy of the ricin video to the police.
When, in October, I showed that the chemical lists found in London were an exact copy of pages on an internet site in Palo Alto, California, the prosecution gave up on the Kabul and al-Qaida link claims. But it seems this information was not shared with the then home secretary, David Blunkett, who was still whipping up fear two weeks later. "Al-Qaida and the international network is seen to be, and will be demonstrated through the courts over months to come, actually on our doorstep and threatening our lives," he said on November 14.
The most ironic twist was an attempt to introduce an "al-Qaida manual" into the case. The manual - called the Manual of the Afghan Jihad - had been found on a raid in Manchester in 2000. It was given to the FBI to produce in the 2001 New York trial for the first attack on the World Trade Centre. But it wasn't an al-Qaida manual. The name was invented by the US department of justice in 2001, and the contents were rushed on to the net to aid a presentation to the Senate by the then attorney general, John Ashcroft, supporting the US Patriot Act.
To show that the Jihad manual was written in the 1980s and the period of the US-supported war against the Soviet occupation was easy. The ricin recipe it contained was a direct translation from a 1988 US book called the Poisoner's Handbook, by Maxwell Hutchkinson.
We have all been victims of this mass deception. I do not doubt that Bourgass would have contemplated causing harm if he was competent to do so. But he was an Islamist yobbo on his own, not an Al Qaida-trained superterrorist. An Asbo might be appropriate.
________________________________________________________
Duncan Campbell is an investigative writer and a scientific expert witness on computers and telecommunications. He is author of War Plan UK and is not the Guardian journalist of the same name
Thursday, April 28, 2005
How many pages was it again, Mr Straw?
Lying Blair toady Jack 'Out of a Job' Straw make the lightning rounds of the media outlets over the last 14 hours or so, following on from the worryingly timely revelations about the Attorney General's advice about Iraq to the lying leader.
For it is Blair.
Why does he keep mentioning the amount of pages in the submissions made to Parliament?
In the interview he gave to The World Tonight (BBC Radio 4, 22.00hrs), included him saying (at my count) the figure 12 seperate times.
Blinding us with numbers, perhaps in the hope that we should be impressed by his superb memory. Surely not...
It would be a cynical man indeed who would suggest such a thing.
Ahh, so that'd be me, then.
For it is Blair.
Why does he keep mentioning the amount of pages in the submissions made to Parliament?
In the interview he gave to The World Tonight (BBC Radio 4, 22.00hrs), included him saying (at my count) the figure 12 seperate times.
Blinding us with numbers, perhaps in the hope that we should be impressed by his superb memory. Surely not...
It would be a cynical man indeed who would suggest such a thing.
Ahh, so that'd be me, then.
Friday, April 22, 2005
Thursday, April 21, 2005
Mr Craig Murray
Here is a man who needs both your attention and support.
His name is Craig Murray, and he is doing something very valuable.
So - go take a look.
Beacuse, let's face it - you hate Jack Straw as much as any sensible person should, don't you?
His name is Craig Murray, and he is doing something very valuable.
So - go take a look.
Beacuse, let's face it - you hate Jack Straw as much as any sensible person should, don't you?
Friday, March 11, 2005
Out of the west came an odious fool
That'd be Jack (Let's Bomb Iraq) Straw, the man who just can't say no. Unles the question involves illegal and unsupported incursions/invasions into other countries. But, strangely, not Zimbabwe. I'm sure his conscience doesn't bother him. He had that taken out as a three for two with his reason and his morality.
Chicken Yoghurt has the details.
Move along people, there are links to be checked out here...
Jack Straw lying with Colin Powell [and it's pronounced the normal way; normal spelling - normal pronounciation]
Jack Straw lying to Parliament
Jack Straw lying alongside his f**king lying boss.
Jack Straw lying about something else.
It's bloody endless. Unless we vote these fuckers out.
Let me put it plainly: Jack Straw is a mealy mouthed, lying, two-faced weasel who no more deserves your vote than a hedgehog deserves to be cooked after being coated in clay.
[Oh, and apologies to John Martyn for bastardising his wonderful song lyric.]
Chicken Yoghurt has the details.
Move along people, there are links to be checked out here...
Jack Straw lying with Colin Powell [and it's pronounced the normal way; normal spelling - normal pronounciation]
Jack Straw lying to Parliament
Jack Straw lying alongside his f**king lying boss.
Jack Straw lying about something else.
It's bloody endless. Unless we vote these fuckers out.
Let me put it plainly: Jack Straw is a mealy mouthed, lying, two-faced weasel who no more deserves your vote than a hedgehog deserves to be cooked after being coated in clay.
[Oh, and apologies to John Martyn for bastardising his wonderful song lyric.]
Tuesday, March 08, 2005
Gerry Kelly - Bless Him
Gerry Kelly - Justice spokeman for Sinn Fein.
So, Mr Kelly, do you represent murderers?
It'd be nice if you could let us know.
Either Sinn Fein is the political wing of the IRA or they are not.
Do you support the offer of the IRA to kill the murderers of Mr McCartney or do you not?
It's time to make your bloody minds up, you murdering shits.
So, Mr Kelly, do you represent murderers?
It'd be nice if you could let us know.
Either Sinn Fein is the political wing of the IRA or they are not.
Do you support the offer of the IRA to kill the murderers of Mr McCartney or do you not?
It's time to make your bloody minds up, you murdering shits.
Wednesday, March 02, 2005
Sir Spam-A-Lot (second today!)
And this afternoon's winner of the Sir Spam-A-Lot award for creative shite is the owner of:
california.com
These f*ckers identify themselves as follows:
Administrative Contact :
Loebig, Larry
(LL49)
larry@GLOBAL.CALIFORNIA.COM
1624 FRANKLIN ST STE 30
OAKLAND, CA 94612-2811
US
Phone: (510) 287-8450
Technical Contact :
Putney, Bill Hostmaster
(BP155)
billp@WWPC.COM
5780 Balmoral Drive
Oakland, CA 94619
US
Phone: (510) 531-2412
Whatever you do, don't ring them up or anything.
That would be wrong.
Bad person!
california.com
These f*ckers identify themselves as follows:
Administrative Contact :
Loebig, Larry
(LL49)
larry@GLOBAL.CALIFORNIA.COM
1624 FRANKLIN ST STE 30
OAKLAND, CA 94612-2811
US
Phone: (510) 287-8450
Technical Contact :
Putney, Bill Hostmaster
(BP155)
billp@WWPC.COM
5780 Balmoral Drive
Oakland, CA 94619
US
Phone: (510) 531-2412
Whatever you do, don't ring them up or anything.
That would be wrong.
Bad person!
Sir Spam-A-Lot (an ongoing series)
This nice man would like to offer great trading information, and at no cost!
Apart from, that is, your bandwidth used to download his crap.
Here are his Whois details:
Daniel Johnson,
whois.2004-06-23.tkcfmmzdwda5jcseghvcmyfz.nospam@1sthost.net
Unit 2, 7 Cheapside
Reading, Berkshire RG1 7AG
GB
014355 147089
Snappy email address, complete with the hilarious 'no spam' tag; What a riot!
The phone number, of course, is dud.
Apart from, that is, your bandwidth used to download his crap.
Here are his Whois details:
Daniel Johnson,
whois.2004-06-23.tkcfmmzdwda5jcseghvcmyfz.nospam@1sthost.net
Unit 2, 7 Cheapside
Reading, Berkshire RG1 7AG
GB
014355 147089
Snappy email address, complete with the hilarious 'no spam' tag; What a riot!
The phone number, of course, is dud.
Tuesday, March 01, 2005
Intel - A suitable case for treatment
Certain things make me smile, other things make me chuckle, some things make me laugh out loud, and some things cause me to soil my trousers, I'm laughing so much.
From yesterday's 'Register' came one such thing.
Read it and weep (with laughter).
From yesterday's 'Register' came one such thing.
Read it and weep (with laughter).
Monday, February 28, 2005
Greedy - Us?
Well done, Music Industry executives!
Not content with abragating all responsibility for having to provide a cheap jewel case and some badly printed inside sleeve with your tawdry wares, it would seem that legal downloads are now 'too expensive'.
Genius at work, truly. Kazaas all round, methinks.
Not content with abragating all responsibility for having to provide a cheap jewel case and some badly printed inside sleeve with your tawdry wares, it would seem that legal downloads are now 'too expensive'.
Genius at work, truly. Kazaas all round, methinks.
Tuesday, February 22, 2005
Kevin Hendryx - Reviewer Extraordinaire!
Long years ago, back in the early days of Middle Earth, BBC Radio 4 commisioned Brian Sibley to adapt a 13 hour full cast dramatisation of JRR Tolkien's Lord of the Rings. A stellar [in terms of Radio & Stage] cast was assembled, and off they went. Ian Holm starring as Frodo, John Le Mesurier as Bilbo, Robert Stevens as Aragorn, etc etc. Jane Morgan and Penny Lester headed up Production, and a masterpiece of modern radio drama was born.
Kevin Hendryx didn't like it, though. He understands the subtlety and nuance that go into the making of top-drawer drama. That would be why he listens to it in his car. I'm surprised he can hear anything over the rattle of his gun rack.
He also doesn't like the 'silly music and singing in places', and would prefer a straight narrative reading. Bless him. I had a quick check around, and found that there were quite a few songs in the text of LOTR [the book, Kevin, the book]. In fact someone has gone so far as to put them to music. Which is nice. Not quite my cup of tea, but I'm sure it's pleasant enough.
Although claiming himself to be the 'great Tolkien buff', his failing memory must has missed the numerous songs. Easily done, I suppose.
But what really puts the tin lid on it is saying that the Riders of Rohan in this excellent production sound "like Monty Python Vikings, frankly".
What The F**k?
Could anyone suggest how we stop this maniac from poisoning the bitstream of the internet further?
Pretty please?
Kevin Hendryx didn't like it, though. He understands the subtlety and nuance that go into the making of top-drawer drama. That would be why he listens to it in his car. I'm surprised he can hear anything over the rattle of his gun rack.
He also doesn't like the 'silly music and singing in places', and would prefer a straight narrative reading. Bless him. I had a quick check around, and found that there were quite a few songs in the text of LOTR [the book, Kevin, the book]. In fact someone has gone so far as to put them to music. Which is nice. Not quite my cup of tea, but I'm sure it's pleasant enough.
Although claiming himself to be the 'great Tolkien buff', his failing memory must has missed the numerous songs. Easily done, I suppose.
But what really puts the tin lid on it is saying that the Riders of Rohan in this excellent production sound "like Monty Python Vikings, frankly".
What The F**k?
Could anyone suggest how we stop this maniac from poisoning the bitstream of the internet further?
Pretty please?
Yeah, Kevin's Back!
Good God! Some people just aren't content with just 15 minutes of fame. It would seem the footling hobbit from Austin, TX is at it again.
I think he must have updated his Amazon profile, because there are some worrying new additions to his list of interests. Scottish bagpiping has crept in now, much to the wider world's concern, and he has been holding forth of the crap BBC kilted soap 'Monarch of The Glen'. It's always nice to hear Texans let us know that something is as charming as a day in Brigadoon.
So, that would something that only happens once every 100 years, or am I misconstruing for comic effect?
It's always nice to see reviewers on Amazon being ignored by the online shopping public. To see the phrase
always makes me smile. Sick puppy that I am.
Kevin's NB on Season 2 of Star Trek TNG "The Pakleds never fail to make me laugh".
What need one add to that?
I think he must have updated his Amazon profile, because there are some worrying new additions to his list of interests. Scottish bagpiping has crept in now, much to the wider world's concern, and he has been holding forth of the crap BBC kilted soap 'Monarch of The Glen'. It's always nice to hear Texans let us know that something is as charming as a day in Brigadoon.
So, that would something that only happens once every 100 years, or am I misconstruing for comic effect?
It's always nice to see reviewers on Amazon being ignored by the online shopping public. To see the phrase
3 of 22 people found the following review helpful
always makes me smile. Sick puppy that I am.
Kevin's NB on Season 2 of Star Trek TNG "The Pakleds never fail to make me laugh".
What need one add to that?
Newtonian Phisicks Part 2 - How To Argue Your Way Out Of A Wet Paper Bag
Stephen Newton, [ex-Hunt Sab for those of you who don’t know him] the Labour Party apologist and all-round master of the obfuscatory school of debate and interchange was railing against our chums over at BackingBlair.co.uk, and thought he’d made his case rather well.
Just for the record, then:
It’s not a London Underground ‘film’, the swf file is Flash content. [Err - Internet, heard of that, have we?]
BTW, you managed to describe it correctly first of all, but obviously that was before the medication kicked in.
Oh dear, oh dear, Stephen. Why doesn’t your argument remain consistent? Could it be that this erstwhile master of the
Who can say?
Just for the record, then:
It’s not a London Underground ‘film’, the swf file is Flash content. [Err - Internet, heard of that, have we?]
BTW, you managed to describe it correctly first of all, but obviously that was before the medication kicked in.
Oh dear, oh dear, Stephen. Why doesn’t your argument remain consistent? Could it be that this erstwhile master of the
Museum of Spam[whatever…] has taken to dealing out what he collects?
Who can say?
Newtonian Phisicks Part 1
Quick one, and one which is probably known to Hunt Saboteurs present and passim [see below] are the comments of the ex-executive of the League Against Cruel Sports.
I would hate to suggest that hunting is the right [wing] thing to do, but the comments are interesting. Especially that of Miles Cooper -
...(Mr Cooper) concludes, "That the League is responsible for briefing and guiding MPs is worrying enough, given its inability to mount well balanced argument which takes full account of the implications. More worryingly still is the prospect that this Labour Government could seriously contemplate the abolition of ‘sport’ hunting given the likely animal welfare implications and the Leagues clear long-term aim with regard to shooting."
God forbid that any organisation so worthy would stoop to underhand [or just plain inept] tactics. Stephen, any comments from you?
I would hate to suggest that hunting is the right [wing] thing to do, but the comments are interesting. Especially that of Miles Cooper -
...(Mr Cooper) concludes, "That the League is responsible for briefing and guiding MPs is worrying enough, given its inability to mount well balanced argument which takes full account of the implications. More worryingly still is the prospect that this Labour Government could seriously contemplate the abolition of ‘sport’ hunting given the likely animal welfare implications and the Leagues clear long-term aim with regard to shooting."
God forbid that any organisation so worthy would stoop to underhand [or just plain inept] tactics. Stephen, any comments from you?
Protecting Idiots In Democracy
Been away for a while, ironically looking after someone else's website. Ho Hum. But the antics of Stephen Newton have really started to irritate a number of people. I, on the other hand, am just rather curious as to why [especially as an ex-Hunt Sab...] he seems unable to grasp the simple structures of the english language. But then [as an ex-Hunt Sab] perhaps he's just too stupid to read carefully. That's little harsh, I'll grant you, but probably true. The estimable Mr Newton has been popping his garters at the Backing Blair.co.uk site and the rather intriguing story they ran about a DOS attack that happened last week. He is under the odd impression that this is some vast and pervasive conspiracy that seeks to undermine the very fabric of..... etc etc etc. He even goes so far as to cite Stalinistic methods on the part of Backing Blair to further their claims of a DOS attack.
Cretin.
And of course, if it were indeed any great surprise, he's one of those luminaries who love to spout on Amazon's review boards. They're everywhere, I tell you - everywhere! Back in the real world, however, Backing Blair is a website worth your time, and I for one will be flyposting their downloadable posters everywhere I possibly can.
Cretin.
And of course, if it were indeed any great surprise, he's one of those luminaries who love to spout on Amazon's review boards. They're everywhere, I tell you - everywhere! Back in the real world, however, Backing Blair is a website worth your time, and I for one will be flyposting their downloadable posters everywhere I possibly can.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)